PerpScopePerpetual DEX Analytics
RankingsCompareFeesAirdropsLearnGlossary
← All Perp Comparisons

Variational vs Aster: Full Comparison 2026

Detailed comparison of Variational and Aster perpetual DEXs including trading fees, 24h volume, open interest, supported chains, and airdrop opportunities. Find out which perp exchange is better for your trading needs.

Live data from DefiLlama

Quick Verdict

Aster comes out ahead in this comparison with 2 advantages vs 1 for Variational. It has higher trading volume, more open interest,. Trading $100K monthly on Variational saves ~$40 in fees.

Higher Volume

Aster

Lower Fees

Variational

More OI

Aster

Active Airdrop

Neither

Variational logo

Variational

Arbitrum

Trade on Variational
Aster logo

Aster

Multi-chain

Trade on Aster

Side-by-Side Comparison

Real-time metrics from DefiLlama. Green indicates the better value.

MetricVariationalAster
24h Volume$1.96B $5.68B
Open Interest$962M $2.73B
Maker Fee0% 0.005%
Taker Fee0% 0.04%
BlockchainArbitrumMulti-chain
Airdrop StatusPointsLiveClaiming
Order TypeRFQCLOB
Variational

Variational Pros & Cons

Lower taker fees (0% vs 0.04%)
Zero maker fees for limit orders
RFQ model may offer better execution on large orders
−Lower trading volume than competitor
−Lower open interest
Aster

Aster Pros & Cons

Higher trading volume and liquidity
More open interest indicates trader confidence
−Higher taker fees (0.04% vs 0%)

Trading Cost Comparison

Estimated taker fees for different trade sizes (excluding slippage and funding)

Trade SizeVariationalAsterSavings
$1,000$0.00$0.40$0.40 on Variational
$10,000$0.00$4.00$4.00 on Variational
$50,000$0.00$20.00$20.00 on Variational
$100,000$0.00$40.00$40.00 on Variational

Variational vs Aster: Detailed Analysis

Volume & Liquidity

Aster leads in 24-hour trading volume with $5.68B, compared to $1.96B for Variational. Higher volume typically means better liquidity, tighter bid-ask spreads, and less slippage on trades. For active traders executing multiple trades daily, this difference can significantly impact overall costs.

Fee Structure

Variational charges 0% maker / 0% taker fees, while Aster charges 0.005% maker / 0.04% taker fees. For a trader with $100,000 monthly volume, using Variational would save approximately $40 per month in trading fees alone. Note: Variational uses an RFQ (Request for Quote) model where execution costs may be embedded in the spread rather than explicit fees.

Open Interest

Aster has $2.73B in open interest, versus $962M for Variational. Open interest represents the total value of outstanding derivative contracts that haven't been settled. Higher OI generally indicates more active trading and can provide insights into market sentiment.

Airdrop Opportunities

Neither platform currently has an active airdrop. Variational: PointsLive. Aster: Claiming. Check our airdrops page for the latest updates.

Variational vs Aster FAQ

Conclusion: Which Should You Choose?

Based on the data, Aster appears to be the stronger choice overall with advantages in trading volume, open interest. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs:

  • • For lowest fees: Choose Variational
  • • For best liquidity: Choose Aster
  • • For airdrop farming: Neither has an active airdrop
  • • For large orders: Choose Aster for deeper liquidity

Related Perp Comparisons

Variational vs HyperliquidAster vs HyperliquidVariational vs LighterAster vs Lighter

Learn more about Variational or Aster

Compare all perp fees · View perp airdrops · Track open interest

Rankings•Compare•Fees Calculator•Airdrops•Open Interest•Learn•Glossary
Popular:HyperliquidLighterParadexedgeXVariationalHyperliquid FeesHyperliquid vs dYdX
Contact•Privacy Policy•Terms of Service•Cookie Policy

© 2026 PerpScope. Data for informational purposes only. Not financial advice.