PerpScopePerpetual DEX Analytics
RankingsCompareFeesAirdropsLearnGlossary
← All Perp Comparisons

Pacifica vs Hyperliquid: Full Comparison 2026

Detailed comparison of Pacifica and Hyperliquid perpetual DEXs including trading fees, 24h volume, open interest, supported chains, and airdrop opportunities. Find out which perp exchange is better for your trading needs.

Live data from DefiLlama

Quick Verdict

Hyperliquid comes out ahead in this comparison with 2 advantages vs 1 for Pacifica. It has higher trading volume, more open interest,. Trading $100K monthly on Pacifica saves ~$5 in fees.

Higher Volume

Hyperliquid

Lower Fees

Pacifica

More OI

Hyperliquid

Active Airdrop

Neither

Pacifica logo

Pacifica

Solana

Trade on Pacifica
Hyperliquid logo

Hyperliquid

Hyperliquid L1

Trade on Hyperliquid

Side-by-Side Comparison

Real-time metrics from DefiLlama. Green indicates the better value.

MetricPacificaHyperliquid
24h Volume$590M $7.49B
Open Interest$280M $9.02B
Maker Fee0.015% 0.015%
Taker Fee0.04% 0.045%
BlockchainSolanaHyperliquid L1
Airdrop StatusPointsLivePointsLive
Order TypeCLOBCLOB
Pacifica

Pacifica Pros & Cons

Lower taker fees (0.04% vs 0.045%)
−Lower trading volume than competitor
−Lower open interest
Hyperliquid

Hyperliquid Pros & Cons

Higher trading volume and liquidity
More open interest indicates trader confidence
−Higher taker fees (0.045% vs 0.04%)

Trading Cost Comparison

Estimated taker fees for different trade sizes (excluding slippage and funding)

Trade SizePacificaHyperliquidSavings
$1,000$0.40$0.45$0.05 on Pacifica
$10,000$4.00$4.50$0.50 on Pacifica
$50,000$20.00$22.50$2.50 on Pacifica
$100,000$40.00$45.00$5.00 on Pacifica

Pacifica vs Hyperliquid: Detailed Analysis

Volume & Liquidity

Hyperliquid leads in 24-hour trading volume with $7.49B, compared to $590M for Pacifica. Higher volume typically means better liquidity, tighter bid-ask spreads, and less slippage on trades. For active traders executing multiple trades daily, this difference can significantly impact overall costs.

Fee Structure

Pacifica charges 0.015% maker / 0.04% taker fees, while Hyperliquid charges 0.015% maker / 0.045% taker fees. For a trader with $100,000 monthly volume, using Pacifica would save approximately $5 per month in trading fees alone.

Open Interest

Hyperliquid has $9.02B in open interest, versus $280M for Pacifica. Open interest represents the total value of outstanding derivative contracts that haven't been settled. Higher OI generally indicates more active trading and can provide insights into market sentiment.

Airdrop Opportunities

Neither platform currently has an active airdrop. Pacifica: PointsLive. Hyperliquid: PointsLive. Check our airdrops page for the latest updates.

Pacifica vs Hyperliquid FAQ

Conclusion: Which Should You Choose?

Based on the data, Hyperliquid appears to be the stronger choice overall with advantages in trading volume, open interest. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs:

  • • For lowest fees: Choose Pacifica
  • • For best liquidity: Choose Hyperliquid
  • • For airdrop farming: Neither has an active airdrop
  • • For large orders: Choose Hyperliquid for deeper liquidity

Related Perp Comparisons

Pacifica vs LighterHyperliquid vs LighterPacifica vs edgeXHyperliquid vs edgeX

Learn more about Pacifica or Hyperliquid

Compare all perp fees · View perp airdrops · Track open interest

Rankings•Compare•Fees Calculator•Airdrops•Open Interest•Learn•Glossary
Popular:HyperliquidLighterParadexedgeXVariationalHyperliquid FeesHyperliquid vs dYdX
Contact•Privacy Policy•Terms of Service•Cookie Policy

© 2026 PerpScope. Data for informational purposes only. Not financial advice.