PerpScopePerpetual DEX Analytics
RankingsCompareFeesAirdropsLearnGlossary
← All Perp Comparisons

Hyperliquid vs Ostium: Full Comparison 2026

Detailed comparison of Hyperliquid and Ostium perpetual DEXs including trading fees, 24h volume, open interest, supported chains, and airdrop opportunities. Find out which perp exchange is better for your trading needs.

Live data from DefiLlama

Quick Verdict

Hyperliquid comes out ahead in this comparison with 3 advantages vs 0 for Ostium. It has higher trading volume, more open interest, and lower trading fees. Trading $100K monthly on Hyperliquid saves ~$55 in fees.

Higher Volume

Hyperliquid

Lower Fees

Hyperliquid

More OI

Hyperliquid

Active Airdrop

Neither

Hyperliquid logo

Hyperliquid

Hyperliquid L1

Trade on Hyperliquid
Ostium logo

Ostium

Arbitrum

Trade on Ostium

Side-by-Side Comparison

Real-time metrics from DefiLlama. Green indicates the better value.

MetricHyperliquidOstium
24h Volume$7.49B $95M
Open Interest$9.02B $38M
Maker Fee0.015% 0.03%
Taker Fee0.045% 0.1%
BlockchainHyperliquid L1Arbitrum
Airdrop StatusPointsLivePointsLive
Order TypeCLOBOracle
Hyperliquid

Hyperliquid Pros & Cons

Higher trading volume and liquidity
More open interest indicates trader confidence
Lower taker fees (0.045% vs 0.1%)
Ostium

Ostium Pros & Cons

−Lower trading volume than competitor
−Lower open interest
−Higher taker fees (0.1% vs 0.045%)

Trading Cost Comparison

Estimated taker fees for different trade sizes (excluding slippage and funding)

Trade SizeHyperliquidOstiumSavings
$1,000$0.45$1.00$0.55 on Hyperliquid
$10,000$4.50$10.00$5.50 on Hyperliquid
$50,000$22.50$50.00$27.50 on Hyperliquid
$100,000$45.00$100.00$55.00 on Hyperliquid

Hyperliquid vs Ostium: Detailed Analysis

Volume & Liquidity

Hyperliquid leads in 24-hour trading volume with $7.49B, compared to $95M for Ostium. Higher volume typically means better liquidity, tighter bid-ask spreads, and less slippage on trades. For active traders executing multiple trades daily, this difference can significantly impact overall costs.

Fee Structure

Hyperliquid charges 0.015% maker / 0.045% taker fees, while Ostium charges 0.03% maker / 0.1% taker fees. For a trader with $100,000 monthly volume, using Hyperliquid would save approximately $55 per month in trading fees alone.

Open Interest

Hyperliquid has $9.02B in open interest, versus $38M for Ostium. Open interest represents the total value of outstanding derivative contracts that haven't been settled. Higher OI generally indicates more active trading and can provide insights into market sentiment.

Airdrop Opportunities

Neither platform currently has an active airdrop. Hyperliquid: PointsLive. Ostium: PointsLive. Check our airdrops page for the latest updates.

Hyperliquid vs Ostium FAQ

Conclusion: Which Should You Choose?

Based on the data, Hyperliquid appears to be the stronger choice overall with advantages in trading volume, open interest, lower fees. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs:

  • • For lowest fees: Choose Hyperliquid
  • • For best liquidity: Choose Hyperliquid
  • • For airdrop farming: Neither has an active airdrop
  • • For large orders: Choose Hyperliquid for deeper liquidity

Related Perp Comparisons

Hyperliquid vs LighterOstium vs LighterHyperliquid vs edgeXOstium vs edgeX

Learn more about Hyperliquid or Ostium

Compare all perp fees · View perp airdrops · Track open interest

Rankings•Compare•Fees Calculator•Airdrops•Open Interest•Learn•Glossary
Popular:HyperliquidLighterParadexedgeXVariationalHyperliquid FeesHyperliquid vs dYdX
Contact•Privacy Policy•Terms of Service•Cookie Policy

© 2026 PerpScope. Data for informational purposes only. Not financial advice.